Filipe Quintal
Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute, University of Madeira, Caminho da Penteada, Funchal, 9020-105, Madeira, Portugal
Lucas Pereira
Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute, University of Madeira, Caminho da Penteada, Funchal, 9020-105, Madeira, Portugal
Nuno Jardim Nunes
Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute, University of Madeira, Caminho da Penteada, Funchal, 9020-105, Madeira, Portugal
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety; The 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; PERSUASIVE 2012; Linköping; Sweden; June 6-8; Adjunct Proceedings
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 68:13, s. 49-52
Publicerad: 2012-06-06
ISBN:
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Electricity consumption in households is responsible for a significant portion of the total use; making this an important problem to tackle in the broader sustainability field. Researchers often report that raising users’ awareness of their consumption results in real savings. Here we present the results of a long-term study of a low cost non- intrusive load monitoring (NILM) and ecofeedback system capable of providing real time and historical consumption information. The system was deployed in 13 single houses and apartments in an urban area in Portugal. 58 weeks after the deployment it was observed that; even though the users were more aware of their consumption; no significant steps were taken to decrease it.
1. Enerdata Global Energy Statistical Year Book 2011: http://yearbook.enerdat a.com (January 2012)
2. Pacala; S.; & Socolow; R.: Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science; 305(5686); 968-72. (2004)
3. Kohlenberg; R.; Phillips; T.; & Proctor; W.: A behavioral analysis of peaking in residential electrical-energy consumers. In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis; 9(1); 31-18. (1976)
4. Wilhite; H.: Experiences with the implementation of an informative energy bill in Norway. Ressurskonsult report 750; Oslo. (1997)
5. Wilhite; H.; Hoivik; A. Olsen J. G.: Advances in the use of consumption feedback information in energy billing: the experiences of a Norwegian energy utility. In: Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. (1999)
6. Parker; D.; Hoak; D.; Meier; A.; & Brown; R.: How much energy are we using? Potential of residential energy demand feedback devices. In: 2006 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. (2006)
7. Peschiera; G.; Taylor; J.E.; Siegel; J.A.: Response-relapse patterns of building occupant electricity consumption following exposure to personal; contextualized and occupant peer network utilization data. In: Energy and Buildings; vol. 42; pp. 1329–1336; ( 2010)
8. Broom; L.; Katzeff; C.; Bång; M.; Nyblom; Å.; Hjelm; I. S.; & Ehrnberger; K.: Coffee maker patterns and the design of energy feedback artefacts. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 93-102: ACM. (2010)
9. Nunes; N. J.; Pereira; L.; Quintal; F.; Bergés; M. (2011). Deploying and evaluating the effectiveness of energy eco-feedback through a low-cost NILM solution. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. (2010)
