Publicerad: 2011-09-30
ISBN:
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
This article concerns the formation; institutionalisation and development of national museums in Latvia. The major foundational and restructuring events of three museums of national importance are described in relation to nation-building and state-making processes; including an overview of transformations in organisation and representational policies during the times of historical change related to both world wars and occupation regimes. In each of the case studies; the relative powers of individual; civic; academic; professional and state initiatives are examined. This article also includes an overview of the organisation of the structural interface between cultural policy and particular museums in particular periods of time; indicating the most important institutions and referencing the recognition or denial of different groups in this process. Selection and changes in the content of museums’ collections and displays are also taken into account.
Since interest in popular antiquities or wonders of nature and artefacts of fine art were formed into collections available to the general public; national museums in the territory of (contemporary) Latvia have undergone several stages of development. To begin with; they represented the interests of the Baltic German upper class; then; being owned by one of the richest municipalities of the Russian Empire; Riga; they became the city’s pride; in their next stage; they transformed into cultural treasuries of the emerging nation-state; and after that followed a period in which they served as local archives representing the pre-Soviet past under the conditions of the communist regime. Today; Latvian national museums have acquired the status of national representatives in the contesting arena of independent European countries. The following three museums are best suited to Eunamus research interests due to their historical role and contemporary status:
- The Latvian National Museum of Art
- The National History Museum of Latvia
- The Ethnographic Open-Air Museum
All three museums have played a significant role in the nation-building process; they continue to be influential in contemporary society and their very different histories provide a complex insight into the various paths taken to establish various forms of national museums. They all qualify as major national museums; covering complementary fields (history; art and ethnography).
Apsitis; A. (2004) Zinojums; nolasits 2004. gada 4. februari. Archive of Open-Air Museum: BDMMZM 1625.
Balode; U. (1996) ‘Rigas Latviešu biedribas etnografiskas kolekcijas tapšanas vesture un šodiena’; Latvijas Zinatnu akademijas vestis. A; vol 50; 6 (587): 48–55.
Ceruzis; R. (2001) Latvia in the 20th Century; Riga: Latvijas Instituts. Online. Available at <http://www.li.lv/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=27&Itemid=109 6> (accessed 10 January; 2011).
Cielava; S. (ed.) (1986) Latviešu telotaja maksla: 1866.–1940. Riga: Zinatne.
Ginters; V. (1974) ‘Latvijas brivdabas muzejs 50 gados’; Universitas; 33: 3–16.
Indans; J. (1994) ‘Par likumsakaribam; personibam un dažiem blakusapstakliem Brivdabas muzeja vesture’; Latvijas vestures instituta žurnals; 3 (24): 74–85.
—— (1996) ‘Neiespejama saruna ar Dr. Augustu Bilenšteinu pec Latviešu etnografiskas izstades’; Latvijas Zinatnu akademijas vestis. A; vol 50; 6 (587): 25–37.
—— (2004) Brivdabas muzejs mazak zinamie gadi: 1940–1944. Archive of Open-Air Museum: BDMMZM 1653: 1–14.
Jaunsudrabinš; J. (1910) ‘"Baltijas makslinieku biedriba" un latviešu makslinieki’; Latvija; 10 (14.01): 3.
Jerans; P. (ed.) (1988) ‘Etnografiskais brivdabas muzejs; Latvijas’; in Enciklopedija Riga; Riga: Galvena Enciklopediju Redakcija; 279–280.
Johansons; A. (1974) ‘Latvijas muzeju sakumi’; Akademiska dzive; 16: 26–29.
Kundzinš; P. (1925) ‘Brivdabas muzejs’; Latvijas saule; 27: 287–294.
Lace; M. (2005) ‘Museum Time: 1918–2005’; in M. Lace (ed.) Valsts Makslas muzejs; Riga: Jumava.
Leimane; M. (1996) ‘Latvijas Vestures muzeja pirmsakums (Rigas Latviešu biedribas muzejs)’; Latvijas Zinatnu akademijas vestis. A; vol 50; 6 (587): 56–72.
Maurina; B. and Šidlovska; V. (2010) Esplanade; Riga: iAptieka. Online. Available at <http://wap.iaptieka.lv/wap-raksti2.php?&id=611> (accessed 14 November; 2010).
Ministry of Culture (2006) National Culture Policy Guidelines 2006–2015; Riga.
Muzeju likums (Law on Museums) (1997); Riga: Latvijas Vestnesis. Online. Available at <http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=44291&from=off> (accessed 23 January; 2011).
Muzeju likums (Law on Museums) (2005); Riga: Latvijas Vestnesis. Online. Available at <http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=124955> (accessed 23 January; 2011).
Priedite; I. (1994) ‘Ieskats latviešu trimdas etnografija’; Latvijas vestures instituta žurnals; 3 (24): 86–96.
Skola; J. (ed.) (1979) Muzeji un kulturas pieminekli Latvija. Riga: Zvaigzne.
Šmite; E. (2005) ‘Art Comes into the Lives of the Citizens of Riga’; in M. Lace (ed.) Valsts Makslas muzejs; Riga: Jumava.
Stradinš; J. (1996) ‘Rigas Latviešu biedribas Zinibu komisijas petnieciskas ieceres (19.g. beigas – 20. gs. sakums)’; Latvijas Zinatnu akademijas vestis. A; vol 50; 6 (587): 20–24.
Švabe; A.; Bumanis A. and Dišlers K. (eds) (1929–1930) Latviešu konversacijas vardnica. vol. 4; Riga: A. Gulbis.
Vanaga; L. (1996) ‘Latviešu etnografiskas izstades sagatavošana (1894–1896)’; Latvijas Zinatnu akademijas vestis. A; vol 50; 6 (587): 38–47.
Viksna; R. and Stradinš; J. (1997) ‘Rigas Latviešu biedribas Zinibu komisija Latvijas un Rigas Kulturvesture’; Latvijas vestures instituta žurnals; 3 (24): 103–126.
