Konferensartikel

Strong Coupling of Modelica System-Level Models with Detailed CFD Models for Transient Simulation of Hydraulic Components in their Surrounding Environment

Antoine Viel
LMS Imagine, France

Ladda ner artikelhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp11063256

Ingår i: Proceedings of the 8th International Modelica Conference; March 20th-22nd; Technical Univeristy; Dresden; Germany

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 63:29, s. 256-265

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2011-06-30

ISBN: 978-91-7393-096-3

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

Strong coupling with a CFD software is usually suited to the coupled transient simulation of an hydraulic component (like a valve; a pump; ...) with its surrounding environment. Due to the nature of the solvers used by CFD code; co-simulation is generally the best way to couple a Modelica system-level simulator and a CFD solver. This article describes a methodology and the associated technology for establishing a cosimulation between a Modelica model simulated with an ODE/DAE solver like the one encountered in LMS Imagine.Lab AMESim; and a 3D model of flow computed by a CFD software. The physical; numerical; and computer-related aspects of co-simulation handled by this methodology are exemplified on an application test case in fluid power.

Nyckelord

Tool Coupling; Co-simulation; Hydraulic Component Modeling; CFD

Referenser

[1] Akers A.; Gassman M.; Smith R.; Hydraulic Power System Analysis; CRC Press; 2006. doi: 10.1201/9781420014587.

[2] Mc Cloy D.; Martin H.R.; Control of Fluid Power: Analysis and Design; Wiley; 1980.

[3] Lebrun M.; Richards C.W.; How to create good models without writing a single line of code; 4th Scandinavian Int. Conference on Fluid Power; Linköping; Sweden; June 1997; vol. 1.

[4] Mittwollen N.; Michl T.; Breit R.; Parametric hydraulic valve model including transitional flow effects. In: Proceedings of the 2nd MATHMOD Vienna; IMACS Symposium on Mathematical Modelling; Febr. 5-7; 1997; TU Vienna; Austria; Editors: I. Troch; F. Breitenecker; ARGESIM Report No.11.

[5] Clavier A.; Alirand M.; Vernat F.; Sagot B.; Local Approach to Improve the Global Approach of Hydraulic Forces in Ball Poppet Valves; 4th In. Symposium on Fluid Power; Wuhan; China; April 2003.

[6] Baudry X.; Mare J.C.; Linking CFD and lumped parameters analysis for the design of flow compensated spool valve; 1st Fluid Power Net Int. PhD Symposium; Hamburg; Germany; June 2000.

[7] Neyrat S.; Viel A.; Strong Coupling LMS Imagine.Lab Modelica with CFD Software; Report of the sub work package 2.4 of the ITEA2 Eurosyslib Project; LMS Imagine; June 2010.

[8] Franklin G.F.; Powell J.D.; Workman M.L.; Digital Control of Dynamic Systems; Addison Wesley; 1997.

[9] Chung T.J.; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Cambridge University Press; 2002.

[10] Marcer; R.; Audiffren C.; Viel A.; Bouvier B.; Walbott A.; Argueyrolles B.; Coupling 1D System AMESim and 3D CFD EOLE models for Diesel Injection Simulation. In: Proceedings of the ILASS Europe 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems; Brno; Sept. 2010.

[11] Functional Mock-Up Interface for Co-Simulation 1.0 Specification; MODELISAR project (ITEA2 - 07006) and consortium; October 12th; 2010.

Citeringar i Crossref