Martin Gerdes
University of Agder, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Centre for eHealth
Dafferianto Trinugroho
University of Agder, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Centre for eHealth
Rune Fensli
University of Agder, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Centre for eHealth
Ladda ner artikel
Ingår i: Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics 2013; Copenhagen; Denmark; August 20; 2013
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 91:5, s. 19-24
Publicerad: 2013-08-21
ISBN: 978-91-7519-518-6
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
The health care services are focusing on seamless healthcare and defining typical patient flow conditions; where a close follow-up from the patient’s home after hospital treatment can be important in order to avoid read missions. In several international projects different technological solutions have been developed with the aim of obtaining an international standardized solution from end-to-end perspective in the information chain; where vital signs data are measured in the pa-tient’s home and transmitted to the hospital specialist. This is; however; a complex task without any clear recommendations; which leadst o local variations in the implementations and to island solutions. The consequence will be no or limited interoperability of systems across organizations and local boundaries of services. In this paper we will highlight different levels of standards and give some recommendations for future research; based on a typical scenario for a remote home monitoring situation.
Remote home monitoring; Interoperability; Standardization;Data exchange; Mobile health; Seamless healthcare.
[1] "Renewing Health". Deliverable D6.1 Use Cases Version 1.1. 2010.
[2] Thorp J. "Europe’s e-health initiatives". J AHIMA. 2010;81:56-8.
[3] Trigo JD; Alesanco A; Martínez I; García J. "A review on digital ECG formats and the relationships between them". Information Technology in Biomedicine; IEEE Transactions on. 2012;16(3):432-44.
[4] Trigo JD; Chiarugi F; Alesanco A; Martínez-Espronceda M; Serrano L; Chronaki CE; et al. "Interoperability in digital electrocardiography: harmonization of ISO/IEEE x73-PHD and SCP-ECG". Information Technology in Biomedicine; IEEE Transactions on. 2010;14(6):1303-17.
[5] Bond RR; Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Moore G. "A review of ECG storage formats". Int J Med Inf. 2011;80(10):681-97.
[6] ISO/TS 11073-9201:2007. "Health informatics - Medical waveform format - Part 92001: Encoding rules (MFER)" 2007 [cited 2013 June]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=41602.
[7] Health Level 7 annotated ECG. FDA XML Data Format Design Specification. 2002.
[8] DICOM Supplement 30. Waveform Interchange 2011 [cited 2013]. Available from: http://medical.nema.org/Dicom/supps/sup30_lb.pdf.
[9] Brenner M; Musa Unmehopa. "The Silo Syndrome and its Solution". The Open Mobile Alliance: Delivering Service Enablers for Next-Generation Applications: 7-20.
[10] Eugster PT; Felber PA; Guerraoui R; Kermarrec AM; "The many faces of publish/subscribe;" ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR); vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 114-131; 2003.
[11] Fielding RT; "Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures;" Ph.D. disserta-tion; University of California; 2000.
[12] Braa J; Sundeep S; "Integrated health information archi-tecture: power to the users"; Matrix Publishers; New Delhi; 2012.
[13] Carlile PR; "Transferring; Translating; and Transform-ing: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries"; Organization Science Septem-ber/October 2004 15:555-568.
[14] EU-project HITCH; "Establishing Quality Management for Interoperability Testing"; Lisbon 2011; http://hitch-project.eu/sites/www.hitch-project.eu/files/EHR-Q-HITCH-Presentation-20110616.pdf.
[15] Trinugroho YBD; Rasta K; Nguyen TH; Gerdes M; Fensli R; Reichert F; "A Location-Independent Remote Health Monitoring System utilizing Enterprise Service Bus". In: IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet; Volume 10; Number 2; 2012; pp. 88-106.
[16] Hiraia M; Masudab G; (editors) "ECG description in MFER and HL7 version 3". APAMI&CJKMI-KOSMI Conf; 2003.
[17] Marcheschi P; Mazzarisi A; Dalmiani S; Benassi A; (edi-tors); "ECG standards for the interoperability in patient electronic health records in Italy". Computers in Cardiol-ogy; 2006; 2006: IEEE.
[18] Shepherd Platform from Telenor Objects; http://telenorobjects.com/shepherd/
[19] Microsoft HealthVault; https://www.healthvault.com
[20] Caradigm Intelligence Platform; http://www.caradigm.com/en-us/products/caradigm-intelligence-platform/
