Tolga Kurtoglu
Palo Alto Research Center, USA
Peter Bunus
Palo Alto Research Center, USA
Johan De Kleer
Palo Alto Research Center, USA
Ladda ner artikel
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp11063704Ingår i: Proceedings of the 8th International Modelica Conference; March 20th-22nd; Technical Univeristy; Dresden; Germany
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 63:78, s. 704-712
Publicerad: 2011-06-30
ISBN: 978-91-7393-096-3
ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)
Early stage design provides the greatest opportunities to explore design alternatives and perform trade studies before costly design decisions are made. The goal of this research is to develop a simulation-based framework that enables architectural analysis of complex systems during the conceptual design phase. Using this framework; design teams can systematically explore architectural design decisions during the early stage of system development prior to the selection of specific components. The analysis performed at this earliest stage of design facilitates the development of more robust and reliable system architectures. Application of the presented method to the design of a representative aerospace electrical power system (EPS) demonstrates these capabilities.
Simulation-based design; electrical power system; architectural design; concept generation
[1] Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA); Tactical Technology Office (TTO) META-II; BAA-10-59; 2010.
[2] S. Poll; A. Patterson-Hine; J. Camisa; D. Garcia; and D. Hall; "Advanced Diagnostics and Prognostics Testbed;" in 18th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX-07) Nashville; TN; 2007.
[3] T. Kurtoglu; Jensen; D.; Tumer I.Y.; “A Functional Failure Reasoning Methodology for Evaluation of Conceptual System Architectures”; Journal of Research in Engineering Design; published online; January 31; 2010.
[4] Modelica Language; www.modelica.org
[5] Poll Scott; Ann Patterson-Hine; Joe Camisa; David Garcia; David Hall; Charles Lee; Ole J. Mengshoel; Christian Neukom; David Nishikawa; John Ossenfort; Adam Sweet; Serge Yentus; Indranil Roychoudhury; Matthew Daigle; Gautam Biswas; and Xenofon Koutsoukos. (2007). "Advanced Diagnostics and Prognostics Testbed." In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX-07). (Nashville; TN; May 2007; 2007).
[6] NASA Ames Research Center (2006) "Advanced Diagnostics and Prognostics Testbed (ADAPT) System Description; Operations; and Safety Manual;" February; 2006.
[7] Cagan; J.; 2001; “Engineering Shape Grammars;” Formal Engineering Design Synthesis; Antonsson; E. K.; and J. Cagan; eds.; Cambridge University Press.
[8] Rai; R.; Kurtoglu; T.; and Campbell; M.; 2009;"Stochastic interactive graph grammar search for conceptual design" ASME Journal of Computing and Information Sciences in Engineering (Accepted for Publication with review).
[9] Kurtoglu; T.; Campbell; M.; “Automated Synthesis of Electromechanical Design Configurations from Empirical Analysis of Function to Form Mapping”. Journal of Engineering Design; Vol. 20 (1); Feb 2009.
doi: 10.1080/09544820701546165.
[10] Shea; K.; J. Cagan; and S.J. Fenves; 1997; “A Shape Annealing Approach to Optimal Truss Design with Dynamic Grouping of Members"; ASME Journal of Mechanical Design; Vol 119; No. 3; pp. 388-394.
doi: 10.1115/1.2826360.
[11] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; “Aircraft electric power characteristics”; MIL-STD-704F; 12 March 2004.
[12] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; “Air Force Specification Guide: Electrical Power Systems”; Aerospace Vehicles; AFGS-87219A; 30 March 1993.
[13] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; “Characteristics of 28 Volt DC Electrical Systems in Military Vehicles”; MIL-STD-1275D; 29 August 2006.
[14] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; “Selection and Instillation of Aircraft Electronic Equipment”; MIL-STD-7080; 31 May 1994
[15] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; “Joint services specification guide (JSSG-2009) air vehicle subsystems”; Appendix H; 30 October 1998.
