Konferensartikel

Showing interest during first acquaintance

Gülüzar Tuna
University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Jens Allwood
University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Elisabeth Ahlsén
University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Ladda ner artikel

Ingår i: NEALT Proceedings. Northern European Association for Language and Technology; 4th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication; November 15-16; Gothenburg; Sweden

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 93:9, s. 63-69

NEALT Proceedings Series 21:9, p. 63-69

Visa mer +

Publicerad: 2013-10-29

ISBN: 978-91-7519-461-5

ISSN: 1650-3686 (tryckt), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to investigate the expression of interest as an affective-epistemic attitude in first acquaintance conversations. The study presents an analysis of how interest; as one of several different affective-epistemic attitudes; is shown through multimodal expressions between strangers meeting the first time. The results show that interest can be shown both as a single attitude and in combination with other attitudes. Interest as a single attitude occurs more often. The findings indicate that multimodal expressions connected with showing interest mainly include five body movements/gestures; gaze; head movements; holistic face; hand movements and body postures. Gaze occurs 70 times in the case of interest as a single attitude; and in combination with other attitudes 7 times. The corresponding numbers for head movements are 50 times for a single attitude and 7 times for a combined attitude. While smiles (classified as a general face movement) occur 24 times with a single attitude of interest; it occurs 9 times; in a combination with other attitudes. The difference between a single and a combined attitude was less pronounced regarding hand movements – 16 times for a single attitude and 8 times for a combined attitude. The numbers for body postures expressing attitudes were 11 for a single attitude versus only 1 for a combined attitude. The study suggests that there are signs of differences between how women and men show interest; even when taking into account that the number of women in the study exceeds the number of men. The difference between sexes regarding showing interest is bigger concerning the combined attitude type than the single attitude type.

Nyckelord

showing interest; attitude annotation; first acquaintance

Referenser

Allwood; J. (2002). Bodily communication dimensions of expression and content. In Granström; B;. House; D. & Karlsson; I. (eds) Multimodality in language and speech systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; pp. 7–26.

Allwood; J.; Cerrato; L.; Jokinen; K.; Navarretta; C. & Paggio; P. (2007). The MUMIN coding scheme for the annotation of feedback; turn management and sequencing phenomena. IN C. Martin et al. (eds) Multimodal Corpora for Modelling Human Multimodal Behaviour. Language Resources & Evaluation 41; 273–287.

Allwood; J. & Lu; J (2011). Unimodal and Multimodal Co-activation in first encounters: A case study. In P. Paggio et al.  Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication; May 27-28; 2011; University of Helsinki. NEALT Conference Proceedings Series; Vol 15; 2011; pp. 1-9.

Allwood; J.; Chindamo; M. & Ahlsén; E. (2012). Some suggestions for the study of stance in communication. IEEE SocialCom; Amsterdam 2012.

Clift; R. (2006). Indexing stance. Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10/5; 2006; 69-595.

Ekman; P. & Kelner; D. (2008). Facial Expression of Emotion. In Lewis; M. a& Haviland-Jones; H. (eds). Handbook of Emotions 2nd edition. New York; Guilford Publications.

Griffiths; P. E. (2003). Basic Emotions; Complex Emotions; Machiavellian Emotions. In Hatzimoysis; A. (Ed.);Philosophy and the Emotions Cambridge; Cambridge University Press; pp. 39-67.

Kipp; M. (2001). Anvil – A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In Proceedings of Euospeech 2001; pp.1367-1379.

Kiesling; Scott (2009). Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In Jaffe; A. (Ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp.171-194.

Mehrabian; A. (1968). Communication without words. No.P-89. Psychology today reprint series.

Meeren; H. K. M. (2005). Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Laboratory; Tilburg University.

Navarretta; C.; Ahlsén; E.; Allwood; J.; et al. (2011). Creating Comparable Multimodal Corpora for Nordic Languages. Proceedings of the 18th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics. Riga; Latvia; May 11-13. NEALT; pp. 153-160.

Nivre; J. & Allwood; J. (eds.) (1999). Göteborg Transcription Standard. Department of Linguistics Göteborg University. Version 6.4.

Ortony; A.; Turner; T. J. (1990). What´s basic about emotions? Psychological Review. Vol. 97; No. 3; 315-331.

Scherer; K. R. & Ellgring. H. (2007). Multimodal Expression of Emotion: Affect Programs or Componential Appraisal Patterns? Emotion. American Psychological Association. Vol. 7; No. 1; 158–171.

http://www.deepermind.com/02clarty.htm 14:12; 2012-11-02

Citeringar i Crossref