Christian Lundquist
Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping
Martin Skoglund
Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping
Karl Granström
Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping
Torkel Glad
Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping
Download article
Published in: 3:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 75:19, p. 91-97
Published: 2012-06-26
ISBN:
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
[1] J. Liu; D. T. Pysarchik; and W. W. Taylor; “Peer review in the classroom;” BioScience; vol. 52; no. 9; pp. 824–829; Sep. 2002.
[2] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa; “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education;” Journal of Engineering Education; vol. 94; pp. 121–130; Jan. 2005.
[3] A. Hofstein and V. N. Lunetta; “The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research;” Review of Educational Research; vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 201–217; 1982.
[4] ——; “The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twentyfirst century;” Science Education; vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 28–54; Dec. 2004.
[5] J. C. Colosi and C. R. Zales; “Jigsaw cooperative learning improves biology lab courses;” BioScience; vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 118–124; Feb. 1998.
[6] K. Topping; “Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities;” Review of Educational Research; vol. 68; no. 3; pp. 249–276; 1998.
[7] P. A. Kirschner and M. A. M. Meester; “The laboratory in higher science education: Problems; premises and objectives;” Higher Education; vol. 17; pp. 81–98; 1988.
[8] B. H. W. Yung; “Three views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology;” International Journal of Science Education; vol. 23; no. 10; pp. 985–1005; Oct. 2001.
[9] K. J. Topping and S. W. Ehly; “Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation;” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation; vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 113–132; Jun. 2001.
[10] N. Trautmann; “Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports;” Educational Technology Research and Development; vol. 57; no. 5; pp. 685–704; Oct. 2009.
[11] N. J. Pelaez; “Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology.” Advances in physiology education; vol. 26; pp. 174–184; Dec. 2002.
[12] D. E. Berry and K. L. Fawkes; “Constructing the Components of a Lab Report Using Peer Review;” Journal of Chemical Education; vol. 87; no. 1; pp. 57–61; Jan. 2010.
