A. Steen
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
M. Widegren
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Download article
Published in: Proceedings of SIGRAD 2013; Visual Computing; June 13-14; 2013; Norrköping; Sweden
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 94:3, p. 17-24
Published: 2013-11-04
ISBN: 978-91-7519-455-4
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
This paper presents ideas on 3D visualization for pre-operation planning of orthopedic surgery. The focus is on visualizing clinically relevant data for planning a Total Hip Replacement (THR) and investigating how 3D visualization can help improve the planning of procedures. The result is an application that showcases the ideas and reached conclusions. The application visualizes the fit of implants by shading them depending on distance to bone while at the same time giving the user contextual information of the bone anatomy. It also offers ways of measuring and visualizing important distances in a THR by visualizing the end points and the distance of a measurement.
[A.D] A.D.A.M MEDICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA: Osteoarthritis. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001460/; Accessed January 23rd 2013. 3
[Ber07] BERTRAM THE ET AL.: Digital Versus Analogue Preoperative Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasties. The Journal of Arthroplasty 22; 6 (2007). 1; 2
[Chr11] CHRISTIAN DICK; RAINER BURGKART; RÃIJDIGER WESTERMANN: Distance Visualization for Interactive 3D Implant Planning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17; 12 (2011). 2
[E. 12] E. SARIALI ET AL.: Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. a randomised comparison between three -dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthopaedics Traumatology: Surgery Research 98 (2012); 151–158. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22381566. 2
[GZP01] G. ZANETTI R. G.; PLATT R.: Cefoxitin versus erythromycin; neomycin; and cefazolin in colorectal operations. Importance of the duration of the surgical procedure. Emerging Infectious Disease Journal 7; 5 (2001); 828–831. 3
[MMC95] MCGRORY B. J.; MORREY B. F.; CAHALAN T. D.; AN K.-N.; CABANELA M. E.: Effect of femoral offset on range
of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasy. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 77 (1995). 3
[NAM12] N H.; AM N.; M K.; N N.; R A.; W W.; SF A.; CL K.; J R.; Z T.; H C.; A M.; MP E.; DR L.; HS C.; EJ
F.; (EDS) C. K.: SEER Cancer Statistics Review; 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/; Accessed May 2nd 2013. 7
[Oto08] OTOMARU I.: Automated Preoperative Planning of Femoral Component for Total Hip Arthoplasty (THA) from 3D CT Images. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering 3; 4 (2008); 478–489. 2
[PR73] PE C.; R F.: A five-year prospective study of 23;649 surgical wounds. Archives of Surgery 107; 2 (1973); 206–210. 3
[S E98] S EGGLI; M PISAN; M.E. MÃIJLLER: The value of preoperative
planning for total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery (British Volume) 80; 3 (1998); 382–390. 1; 7
[SMT82] SHAPIRO M.; MUôS OZ A.; TAGER I. B.; SCHOENBAUM S. C.; POLK B. F.: Risk factors for infection at the operative
site after abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. New England Journal of Medicine 307; 27 (1982); 1661–1666. PMID: 6755254. 3
[UH12] UWE HOLZWARTH G. C.: Total Hip Arthroplasty. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection; European Union Joint Research Center (2012). 1
[VLA03] VICECONTI M.; LATTANZI R.; ANTONIETTI B.; PADERNI S.; OLMI R.; SUDANESE A.; TONI A.: Ct-based surgical
planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Medical Engineering Physics 25; 5 (2003); 371 – 377. 2
[Yon09] YONA KOSASHVILI ET AL.: Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Canadian Journal of Surgery 52; 1 (2009). 1
