Janitha Chandimal Bandara
Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway
Marianne Sørflaten Eikeland
Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway
Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway
Download article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp1713854Published in: Proceedings of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58) Reykjavik, Iceland, September 25th – 27th, 2017
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 138:7, p. 54-59
Published: 2017-09-27
ISBN: 978-91-7685-417-4
ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)
source to cope with upcoming environmental
challenges. Gasification of biomass is becoming
interested in large scale operation, especially in
synthesis of liquid fuels. Bubbling and circulating
fluidized bed gasification technology has overrun the
interest over fixed bed systems. CFD studies of such
reactor systems have become realistic and reliable with
the modern computer power. Gasifying agent,
temperature and steam or air to biomass ratio are the key
parameters, which are responsible for the synthesis gas
composition. Therefore, multiphase particle-in-cell
CFD modeling was used in this study to analyze the
steam to biomass, S/B, ratio in fluidized bed
gasification.
Due to the complexity of the full loop simulation of dual
circulating fluidized bed reactor system, only the
gasification reactor was considered in this study.
Predicted boundary conditions were implemented for
the particle flow from the combustion reactor. The
fluidization model was validated against experimental
data in beforehand where Wen-Yu-Ergun drag model
was found to be the best. The effect of the S/B ratio was
analyzed at a constant steam temperature of 1073K and
a steam velocity of 0.47 m/s. Four different S/B of 0.45,
0.38, 0.28 and 0.20 were analyzed. The biomass was
considered to be in complete dry condition where single
step pyrolysis reaction kinetics was used. Each
gasification simulation was carried out for 100 seconds.
8% reduction of hydrogen content from 57% to 49% and
17% increment of carbon monoxide from 13% to 30%
were observed when the S/B was reduced from 0.45 to
0.20. Countable amounts of methane were observed at
S/B of 0.28 and 0.20. The lower heating value of the
product gas increased from 10.1 MJ/kg to 12.37 MJ/kg
and the cold gas efficiency decreased from 73.2% to
64.6% when the S/B was changed from 0.45 to 0.20. The
specific gas production rate varied between 1.64 and
1.04 Nm3/kg of biomass.
Biomass gasification, fluidized beds,
gasifying agent, multiphase particle-in-cell